A note on quiet luxury

A note on quiet luxury

The phrase "quiet luxury" has been so over-used in the last three seasons that it has nearly stopped meaning anything. But the idea behind it is older than the phrase, older than fashion as an industry, and worth thinking about carefully because it points at a real question: what is clothing actually for?

The argument against the logo

For most of the history of dressing well, the answer was: clothing is for you. The cut speaks to the wearer. The cloth feels good against your skin. The fit improves your sense of yourself as you walk through a day. None of these qualities require anyone else to notice them; the value is private.

Logos invert this. They convert a piece of clothing from something for the wearer into something for the viewer — a signal, broadcast outwards, of where the piece came from. There is nothing wrong with signalling — humans signal constantly — but it is worth being honest about which side of the line a given piece sits on.

The best compliment a garment can receive is that the wearer was complimented, and the garment was not noticed.

What restraint actually is

Restraint, in clothing, is not the same as plainness. A perfectly cut white shirt, in the right cloth, with a properly proportioned collar, is among the most considered objects you can own. It has had thousands of small decisions made about it — yoke depth, sleeve pitch, button shank, hem curve. The restraint is in not showing the decisions. The decisions are there.

This is what we mean by quiet luxury, if we have to use the phrase. Not minimalism. Not absence. Just: the work is invisible, and the wearer is the centre of the photograph.

What it isn't

Quiet luxury is not an aesthetic to be imitated. It is a consequence of a particular approach to making — to choosing better cloth, hiring more skilled sewers, allowing more time in finishing, designing for repair rather than for replacement. If you do those things, the clothes look the way they look; if you skip them, the look is performative and the cloth is wrong.

This is what we keep returning to in the studio. Make the piece properly. Trust the wearer. The rest takes care of itself.